'Soren Kierkegaard\r'

'Project: Soren Kierkegaard: Mega brainpower of the nineteenth Century Soren Kierkegaard: Mega Mind of the nineteenth Century As a adult male whose work spans across atomic number 18as such as philosophy, theology, devotional literature, and more, Soren Kierkegaard is considered i of the mega- looks of philosophy and the 19th century. He was tranced by many passel end-to-end his sprightliness, as intumesce as influencing many people him ego-importance. With works that ranged from phantasmal views exclusively the way to developing a â€Å"new” way to view our surroundings, Kierkegaard was a very swell-rounded and mentally weighed down man.\r\nthither were few people that could influence such a profound look at the time, that Kierkegaard found them two in church as well as in the realm of philosophy. As a altogether Kierkegaard lead a rather boring brio and was rargonly seen away from his hometown of Copenhagen, Denmark. â€Å"[Kierkegaard] was educated at a prestigious boys school (Borgerdydskolen), then accompanied Copenhagen University where he studied philosophy and theology. His teachers at the university included F. C. Sibbern, Poul Martin Moller, and H.\r\nL. Martensen (McDonald, 1996). ” Moller had a major electronegative effect on Kierkegaard’s philosophic-literary development. In H. L. Martensen, he found the perfect match, unmarried who taught him in school and was involved in the church as well. â€Å"…when [Martensen] became Bishop Primate of the danish pastry People’s Church, Kierkegaard published a vitriolic attack on Martensen’s theological views (McDonald, 1996). ” Martensen was considered one of Kierkegaard’s brain intellectual rivals. other very authorized figure in Kierkegaards life was J. L. Heiberg, the dean of Copenhagens literati (McDonald, 1996). ” Heiberg influenced Kierkegaard to write his first major publication, â€Å"…From the papers of One Still Living, [which] is largely an drive to articulate a Heibergian aesthetics †which is a modified version of Hegels aesthetics (McDonald, 1996). ” A nonher group of people/entities that profoundly influenced Kierkegaard were his induce, his father, and matinee idol.\r\nHis mother had no visible impact on Kierkegaard’s writing, exclusively â€Å"…for a generator who places so much emphasis on indirect communication, and on the semiotics of invisibility, we should attachment this absence as significant (McDonald, 1996). ” There was even another philosopher named Johannes Climacus that stated â€Å"… ‘in Concluding Unscientific Postscript remarks, ‘… how jerry-built then, that an omnipresent being should be identifiable precisely by being concealed’ (McDonald, 1996). ” His father’s influence has been renowned quite frequently in Kierkegaard’s works.\r\nNot only did Kierkegaard inherit hi s fathers melancholy, his disposition of guilt and anxiety, and his pietistic emphasis on the dour aspects of Christian faith, except he also inherited his talents for philosophical account and creative imagination (McDonald, 1996). Kierkegaard was a very religious man, even though he did not attend church on a regular rump. â€Å"He perceived perfection and existence of life from a humanistic view emphasizing the list autonomy of man (Philosopher Kierkegaard, 2011). As roughly a lone man standing, Kierkegaard was in seclusion publishing his writings for intimately of his adult life, due(p) to the atheism of companion philosophers of his time. â€Å"[Kierkegaard’s] legacy was his belief that our response to deity should be one of unrestrained erotic love toward our beloved (Philosopher Kierkegaard, 2011). ” During his later years Kierkegaard matt-up that the Christian religion had become bobble through secular and political involvement, so he started to at tack Christendom saying that the individualistic is fully responsible for their faith in God without doctrinal influence.\r\nThe Christian ideal, fit in to Kierkegaard, is even more exacting since the center of an individuals existence is the artefact on the basis of which s/he is judged by God for h/er eternal validity. Of die hard a writers work is an important neighborhood of h/er existence, but for the routine of judgment we should focus on the whole life not that on one part (McDonald, 1996) Kierkegaard influenced others as well with his works that were published and unpublished throughout his lifetime.\r\nKierkegaard’s Christian philosophy may render been rejected by clergy, but he certainly influenced individual Christians who became beguile with his theology. Most notably atomic number 18 American theologians Paul Tillich and Lincoln Swain, and philosophers from Europe — Karl Jaspers, Gabriel Marcel, Miguel de Unamuno — and from Russia Nikolai B erdyaev (Philosopher Kierkegaard, 2011) Kierkegaard is cognize as one of the fathers of existentialism. experientialists atomic number 18 characterized by: * They are obsessed with how to live ones life and opine that philosophical and psychological dubiousness can help.\r\nThey believe in that respect are certain questions that everyone must deal with (if they are to take human life seriously), and that these are special — existential — questions. Questions such as death, the meaning of human existence, the place of God in human existence, the meaning of value, interpersonal relationship, the place of self-reflective conscious knowledge of ones self in existing. Note that the existentialists on this picture show dont pay much attention to â€Å" well-disposed” questions such as the politics of life and what â€Å"social” responsibility the society or state has. They focus almost entirely on the individual.\r\nBy and large Existentialists believe tha t life is very difficult and that it doesnt fuddle an â€Å"objective” or universally know value, but that the individual must give value by affirming it and living it, not by talking about it. Existential choices and values are primarily show in ACT not in words. Given that one is focusing on individual existence and the â€Å"existential” struggles (that is, in making decisions that are meaningful in everyday life), they often find that literary characterizations rather than more abstract philosophical thinking, are the best ways to unsnarl existential struggles.\r\nThey tend to take independence of the will, the human power to do or not do, as absolutely obvious. straightaway and again there are arguments for relax will in Existentialist literature, but even in these arguments, one gets the hard-hitting sense that the arguments are not for themselves, but for â€Å"outsiders. ” Inside the movement, free will is axiomatic, it is intuitively obvious, it is the backdrop of all else that goes on. There are certainly exceptions to each of these things, but this is fork of a placing of the existentialist-like positions. Corbett, 1985) Kierkegaard contributed to this movement with his works due to the influence of his father and others that are antecedently mentioned, with a melancholy typed self actualization mind set. Kierkegaard did not believe that everyone on earth had the same plan for life, or that they were all here for the same reason, in fact he believed the exact opposite, all people on earth have a different life path, whether that be Christianity or atheism, â€Å"plumber or surgeon”, smart or dumb, he believed that the individual has the power to fulfill whatever sine qua non they please. One xistential quote found was stick on by an anonymous user stated, there is no luck, no fate, no crowning(prenominal) plan in life, there is just determination…100% determination to attend and make something of yours elf. As one of the institution fathers of existentialism and a colossal mind of his time Soren Kierkegaard is now remembered as a mega-mind of the 19th century. With influences galore and a self actualizing personality, he formed a great reputation for himself. Maybe not know in his time, Soren Kierkegaard is by far one of the most influential philosophers of the modern world.\r\nReferences Corbett, B. (1985, March). What is existentialism? Retrieved November 10, 2011, from Webster. edu website: http://www. webster. edu/? ~corbetre/? philosophy/? existentialism/? whatis. html McDonald, W. (1996, celestial latitude 3). 1. Kierkegaard’s Life. In Soren Kierkegaard. Retrieved November 10, 2011, from Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy website: http://plato. stanford. edu/? entries/? kierkegaard/? #Chron Philosopher Kierkegaard. (2011). Retrieved November 10, 2011, from AllAboutPhilosophy. org website: http://www. allaboutphilosophy. org/? philosopher-kierkegaard-faq. htm\r\n'