Case Study †Profitel Inc Essay

Decision maker Lars Peeters, along with his team up of executivesQuestion 1 Which survey of leadership best justifys the problems experienced in this cheek? Analyze the case exploitation concepts discussed in that leadership perspective. Leadership is specify as the collective effectiveness and successes of organizations members by influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute. In this case Lars Peeters, new appointed CEO of Profitel, fails to maintain his office staff by lacking key ingredients cardinal for effective leadership. Together with his executive team he hired from his previous employment, pervert Profitels image and success with customers, presidency leaders and even employees.Listed below atomic number 18 perspectives of leadership I rush place in this case that best explain the problems at hand Contingency aspect Lars had not diagnosed Profitelss situation soundly and adapted their style and objectives to fit that situation. alternatively of using the employees thoughts and insights as a powerful recourses, Lars went ahead with his team of executives and implemented his strategies hacking any feedback.Behavioral prospect Although Lars displays task-oriented behavior by pushing telephoner to reach a certain goal, he lacks in people-oriented behavioral skills. This could explain for his disregard to his subordinates trust and lack of employee morale. Transformational Perspective Lars failed to compose a strategic vision for Profitel. By using one he could pay back build employee morale by change magnitude commitment and rewarding ground on performances.Questions 2 What can organizations do to minify the leadership problems discussed above? In this case Profitels broad based there to hire Lars as CEO based on reputation rather than concentrate on how his expertise could benefit their company. Lars took incentive in implementing all major decisions without others infix or involvement. The board of directors see med to have marginal role in the companys development and should have taken more precautions like overseeing major decisions. Also they should have evaluated his internal performance through feedback from employees and immaterial performance through customers.