Dante and Machiavelli

Dante and Machiavelli limn opposite sides of the Renaissance in several ways. Certainly the former means that matinee idol allow for reveal all and call pot to account for their behavior, man the latter gives ein truth sign of believing in no deity and supposing that scrupulous behavior exclusively makes matchless a target for unpitying exploitation. This difference in the both(prenominal) could be expressed in foothold of religious faithbut they could also be said to take a crap differing views of human nature.Try to get to the heart of the distinction. Why is Machiavellis champion of right and wrong so opposed to Dantes? Written two hundred years apart, The Inferno by Dante and The Prince by Machiavelli both confine examples of gild during the late middle ages and also the beginning of the Renaissance. While non contemporaries, both hands held similar cynical views towards human nature, but opposing views on social social organisation.Dante believed that those wi th power were all destined to become void while Machiavelli wrote that authority is incumbent in aim to brinytain structure within the population. The Inferno, written as the first of three movements of The Divine Comedy, tells of one mans journey into Hell with the help of Roman poet Virgil. As the two men journey through the nine circles of hell, Dante, or the Pilgrim, sees the souls of men and women and either feels pity or hatred, but most of all feels a sense of vengeance.In Dantes hell, the punishment fits the crime. The lustful atomic number 18 compel to walk naked beside those of the opposite sex, the slothful are forced to live at the bottom of the river Styx, and the soothsayers are forced to perpetually look plunk for by having their necks twisted around. The Inferno is essentially a social commentary, exposing societys true evils. In the eighth circle, simple fraud, were the simonists those priests, popes, and bishops who, instead of telltale(a) the glory of m atinee idol, used their power to gain monetary wealth and fame.Their punishment is being buried head first, the soles of their feet on fire. The Pilgrim sees Pope Nicholas III who asks him if he is Boniface, Is that you here already upright? By including these popes in hell, Dante made polish off his views on the leadership of the church and believed that the church had no control or right to control secular and civil matters. Dante also shows which sins he sees as the worst of sins, putting betrayers in the lowest circle of hell. Dante mploys some everyday sense while discussing hell, putting obvious sinners in the lower circles and accustomed to harsher punishments, but he also puts the not-so obvious sinners in hell.Even though one may think he is doing the right thing, all motives are evaluated upon judgment and even a trace of selfishness or greed may threaten ones chance in heaven. This is why Dantes hell is rife with politicians and leaders. Although they may have the co mmunitys outflank interests at heart, politicians become obsessed with fame and glory, often forgetting that they are representatives of the heap.In The Prince, Machiavelli explains what a good and successful prince should be like. He advocates a strong, cutthroat authority figure and encourages the winning of power by any marrow necessary. The main theme in The Prince is that mob rule is dangerous, for people know only what is good for themselves and not what is good for the whole. The common people, in Machiavellis view, are ungrateful, fickle, liars, and deceivers, they shun danger and are greedy for profit while you plough them well, they are yours.He believes that these commoners should be ruled absolutely, yet compassionately, in order to suppress any challenge to ruling power. The only founded political protest should come from the nobles and even then, all should be done so as not to fester impressions of revolution. While it seems as though Machiavelli was a power-hung ry despot, The Prince was further a reaction to what he saw as a necessary evil. Machiavelli was actually a strong genius of the republic in which the people, the very people he describes as being uneducated and self-centered in his book, ruled over themselves.In The Prince, he does give the common people credit, saying that, if a prince upsets them, they can take severe and dangerous action. The beaver fortress that exists is to avoid being hated by the people (XX, 70). Machiavelli unsounded that no matter how much power a prince may have, he is always at the risk of losing it whether it be at the hands of the people or the hands of another prince. Also, because he was first a supporter of republic, he understood the need for certain checks to be put in place to safeguard against revolution and lack of popular support.Machiavelli argues that, unless a princes subjects hate him, they will love him and follow him through any swage that may beset the principality. In general, Mac hiavelli believes that a leader should be a true leader and rally the people behind his cause, even if that means killing off dissenters for the good of the whole. Although, upon first reading, The Prince seems to tell the tale of monocracy and totalitarianism, it is much closer to modern democracy than some would like to believe and still is applicable to modern governments.Representing two diverse ages and two (supposedly) different world views, The Inferno and The Prince are quite similar in that both see humanity as somewhat of an evil and ungrateful status. They differ, however, by their view of what should be done about the human condition. Dante believed that what is done in this life will be punished accordingly in the adjacent life, and there is little to be done, for even the unbelievers are subject to Gods will by being trapped in limbo.Machiavelli, on the other hand, didnt believe in the afterlife and so thought that life should be lived here on earth and sin will be forgiven at death. This way, men can be free to filter for and obtain that which makes them happy, for the pious are buried just like the unbelievers. Ironically, The Prince is more(prenominal) optimistic than The Inferno, for Machiavelli stresses that, despite actions done on earth, all will be forgotten, for sin dies with the body.