Argument Evaluation :: essays research papers

By reading the articles, the argument questions addressed by both arguments ar about the poly changes in case securities or homeland securities after the terrorist good time on Sept 11, 2001. The calamity made all Americans afraid of their safety in flying an aeroplane and made them felt miserable when their friends had died on the attacked. It is very important that the US need to take measures to improve homeland securities to eliminate any possibilities from terrorist attack (terrorist bane) again. The US father employed extra bail measures rather than sacrificing security of the people for some comfort and convenience.The viewpoint of the writer on fanny Ashcroft (Attorney General) is basically to point out on the Patriot Act that brought the modish law to prevent the terrorist. One of the Ashcroft opinion on this articles is Once detained, these lawbreakers are accorded the rights to which they are entitled. I think the INS plays an important role to conduct as a fron t line in the border that guard the US from the terrorist threat, moreover it might give an uncomfortable feeling for foreigner who has zip fastener to do with the terrorist activity. I have a friend who has a citizenship of Oman, but he is originally from India who immigrated to Oman when he was child. One of the times when he was return back from vacation to interpose the US he has a riddle with the immigration due to his citizenship of Oman. Well this situation might happen to a lot for the people who come from Middle East countries who want to enter the US. Another statement that the writer mentioned is To keep the public informed, we have consistently released criminal documents and redacted Immigration and Naturalization Service document as they have been unsealed. We would violate our own creed, a pillar of justice, if we aside genteel liberties in pursuit terrorist. This statement concluded that any kind of possible actions volition be taken by the authorities to avoi d any threat from terrorist attacks. It might violate the civil liberties in order to get a full action against the terrorist threat. The writer view on Anthony D. Romeo, Executive manager of ACLU, was assurance that the Josh Ashcroft and President George W. Bush would not erode civil liberties in oppose to this crisis. One of the examples of that is when Romeo stated that From establishing military tribunal without passing judicial oversight, from expanding wiretapping authority while limiting judicial oversight, from.